Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Serction 28

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Serction 28

    In the early to mid 80s there was an interesting phenomenon in west London, especially around the Notting Hill, Westbourne Grove and Bayswater area of pubs that attracted a parallel clientele of Rastafarians and gay men. There was not much socialising between the two groups but there was tolerance and some bonding over music.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Serction 28

      Originally posted by victorbrunswick View Post
      To me LGBT sounds like a garden railway.
      Feels like an anagrammed acronym of Britain's Got Less Talent or something.
      I've everything I need to keep me satisfied
      There's nothing you can do to make me change my mind
      I'm having so much fun
      My lucky number's one
      Ah! Oh! Ah! Oh!

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Serction 28

        Originally posted by George 1978 View Post
        Feels like an anagrammed acronym of Britain's Got Less Talent or something.
        'Lefties Get Bloody Tiresome' or (to vary the order a little) 'Lumping Groups Together Backfires'.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Serction 28

          Originally posted by Silver Bear View Post
          ... Or a forerunner to the KGB ... although that was the NKVD!
          Who knows what KGB is as an acronym?

          For all you anoraks out there like me:

          Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti

          lol
          sigpic
          Do you really believe the other side without provocation would launch so many ICBM's, subs and ships knowing that we would have no option to launch as well? It would break our MAD Treaty (Mutually Assured Destruction) not to mention the end of the world as we know it.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Serction 28

            Originally posted by George 1978 View Post
            I am glad that we have moved forward since 1967 and that same sex couples are accepted a lot more legally now, and now they can marry each other is even better. I am all for equality so that everyone is equal.
            I think we were equal before. We could all marry someone of the opposite sex (e.g. Tom Robinson), and none of us could marry someone of the same sex.
            Last edited by Clare; 02-06-2018, 10:27.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Serction 28

              Initially we had civil partnerships, which to all intents & purposes constituted 'marriage'
              sigpic
              Do you really believe the other side without provocation would launch so many ICBM's, subs and ships knowing that we would have no option to launch as well? It would break our MAD Treaty (Mutually Assured Destruction) not to mention the end of the world as we know it.

              Comment

              Working...
              X