Ad_Forums-Top

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Working class vs middle class

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • George 1978
    replied
    Originally posted by Arran View Post

    It's almost the opposite now!

    Labour under Jeremy Corbyn probably took the vast majority of the votes from the very poor and socioeconomic group E, but otherwise it drew much of its vote from students, 20 something graduates, hipsters, and the comfortably well off Guardian reading progressive left from London and the trendy cities like Bristol, Manchester, Oxford etc. Corbyn made (white British) people with only an elementary level of education who work for a living in low and semi skilled jobs (the real working class?) want to vomit, and millions voted Conservative or Brexit Party instead. Hence the so called red wall constituencies which fell to the Conservatives – like all three in Stoke on Trent which Labour held even during their previous meltdown in 1983.

    Compare a political map from 1983 with one from 2019.
    There is a lot of truth to all that - I would never have imagined Sedgfield (Tony Blair's old constituency) to be Conservative now. in 2015 I would have assumed that Yeovil would have remained Lib Dem because of Paddy Ashdown's legacy there but that changed as well - back in 1970 the Liberals were third there. I think of Alan Beith, Menzies Campbell and Malcolm Bruce as "the ones that got away" in that respect.

    Interesting about the comparisons between 1983 and 2019 - in my neck of the woods, the Nottingham City constituencies (pre-unitary authority) went Conservative (Michael Knowles, former leader of Kingston-upon-Thames council from 1974 to 1983, take a bow) while the Scargill-supporting mining constituencies north of the county remained Labour, now all the County constituencies have gone to the Conservatives including Bassetlaw and Mansfield which would have happened in the 1980s (they were fed up waiting apparently), while anyone would have thought that Tony Blair was still Prime Minister when one looks at Nottingham City-land - an average of 7.000 Conservative votes for 25,000 Labour ones.

    I think that the fact that the City part is now a unitary authority has meant that they have been "cut off" from the rest of the county. Corbyn only became an MP because Michael O'Halloran, the then Labour MP for Islington North had defected to the SDP - I doubt that Corbyn would have got a chance of getting in otherwise, especially in 1983. I can't imagine a left-wing candidate being elected that year otherwise.

    I know that this not a political forum, and I do apologise of course, but the fact of the matter is, however, that 60% of the past 50 years do come under the scope of this forum, hence the justification of including it on here.



    Leave a comment:


  • Arran
    replied
    Originally posted by Semi42 View Post
    Certainly has changed now,
    in my Comp our career advisor, one of the teachers had a talk on our future options , it all involved shipyards, heavy engineering etc which was big here in the north east of England .
    Further education was never given as an option for anyone even though this was a talk to the top band in the school.in my final year of school , I can recall only one boy in 6th form. He was doing Technical drawing and prob only because his dad was a draughtsman.
    The greasy overalls and flat cap heavy industrial workers were the bedrock of the support base for Old Labour. I doubt that many of the 20 something students, graduates, and hipsters from London and the trendy cities who chant "Ooh Jeremy Corbyn" would want to spend their working lives toiling away in a shipyard or a foundry or down a coal mine.

    It does highlight how out of sync the progressive left and the Metropolitan set are with knucklescraping working class folk from 'real' England.

    The progressive left, along with many 20 something students and graduates, are in a class of their own. Not working class despite their 'left' leaning political views, but not your average middle class suburbanites either despite often originating from this demographic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Semi42
    replied
    Certainly has changed now,
    in my Comp our career advisor, one of the teachers had a talk on our future options , it all involved shipyards, heavy engineering etc which was big here in the north east of England .
    Further education was never given as an option for anyone even though this was a talk to the top band in the school.in my final year of school , I can recall only one boy in 6th form. He was doing Technical drawing and prob only because his dad was a draughtsman
    As for Uni , no one had a chance . I’m sure uni education was free at the time , only these days I see it all being ran as a business

    Leave a comment:


  • Arran
    replied
    Originally posted by George 1978 View Post
    The problem is that politically, it is still seen as Conservative - middle class; Labour - working class
    It's almost the opposite now!

    Labour under Jeremy Corbyn probably took the vast majority of the votes from the very poor and socioeconomic group E, but otherwise it drew much of its vote from students, 20 something graduates, hipsters, and the comfortably well off Guardian reading progressive left from London and the trendy cities like Bristol, Manchester, Oxford etc. Corbyn made (white British) people with only an elementary level of education who work for a living in low and semi skilled jobs (the real working class?) want to vomit, and millions voted Conservative or Brexit Party instead. Hence the so called red wall constituencies which fell to the Conservatives – like all three in Stoke on Trent which Labour held even during their previous meltdown in 1983.

    Compare a political map from 1983 with one from 2019.

    This political 'reversal' has been going for just over 10 years now. The Green Party initiated a Leaving Labour project some time between 2005 and 2015, on the basis of having economic policies to the left of NuLab and they strongly opposed austerity, but they failed to win any notable support from the working class and the poor.

    UKIP has been an economically capitalist party from the outset, which tended to attract more comfortably well off former Tory types, until Nigel Farage took over when millions of working class folk supported the party as if it was the best thing since sliced bread.

    I have concluded that (white British) working class people tend to be conservative (with a small c) stick in the muds who hold right wing views on social issues (similar to those spewed by the Sun and the Daily Mail) and are mildly xenophobic, as well as believing that LGBT people should keep their sexuality personal. It's possible that social policies eclipse economic policies at the ballot box, which explains the very limited support for the Green Party, far left parties, along with the hatred of Jeremy Corbyn – all of which are social liberals who promote progressive policies.

    As previously stated, social liberals and the progressive left tend to be comfortably well off financially. This phenomenon even existed back in the 1930s when Peter Wright mentioned in Spy Catcher that the Communist party was dominated by comfortably well off intellectuals and shunned by the poor and the working class.

    Leave a comment:


  • George 1978
    replied
    Very interesting thread, Arran! I do think that the class system still exists but a bit more transparently - age can be a divider in society, but so can gender as well. The problem is that politically, it is still seen as Conservative - middle class; Labour - working class - Labour win the Daily Mirror-reading unitary authority inner-city constituencies, while the Conservatives still win the rural Daily Telegraph-reading areas which I think is too much of a divide. The same as we thought that BBC - middle class; ITV - working class a la the Swap Shop v Tiswas argument. Class can be such a intrusive and obstructive divide in society and in many ways it can put up barriers between things such as friendships.

    From a Nottingham perspective, "middle class" meant you owned a car and didn't take the bus all the time, you owned a horse at the stables around the corner and wore the jodhpurs to prove it, and you were more likely to live outside the City boundary in areas such as Rushcliffe - if one owned a tractor or a horse, they would almost be living under Rushcliffe rather than Nottingham City. I hated the fact that Nottingham City Council became a unitary authority because when I lived in the inner-city areas, I thought that the Nottinghamshire County Council services that still served my old area had allowed my area to be the same and relate to as the suburbs and rural areas which is what I liked, especially when I went to school under County Council's education system - as of April Fools' Day 1998, it wasn't to be like that anymore - it annoyed me and made me want to move even more. I am a middle class person in a working class body if you like. Now I am in the suburbs thanks to a chance to move a few years ago.

    I tell you something: my parents were as poor as church mice when we lived at home in the seventies and eighties, and so were their parents as well as their parents' parents, ad infinitum going back several generations. I used to wish that my late parents were stereotypical middle class, Times reading, Conservative voting people, and that my father was a Chief Executive of a successful company and my mother was just as successful, bring in a million pounds a year or something - the reality was that my father was signed off due to ill health many years before and read the Daily Star and not The Times. I am the opposite of rich due to personal hardship inherited from my parents and also disability and health-related problems linked to the past, but due to my own views and observations on life, one could say that if I was placed within a group of more middle class people rather than working class ones, I probably would not stand out in the street.

    In summary: so much has changed in the past five decades - inflation in the 1970s being one of them. Something in 1971 would be two and a half times the value seven years later, and that slowed down in the 1980s and 1990s. The 1980s feel more middle class than working class, probably due to Thatcher's premiership and acts such as being able to purchase one's own home. On the other hand, the 1970s would make me think of middle class families, usually a couple with two or more children, living in Middlesex, Surrey or the Home Counties, always tuned to BBC 1 and enjoying Morecambe and Wise at Christmas, and play The Game of Life and all that, but that's probably due to community spirit still going strong, comparing the 1977 and 2002 Queen's Jubilees. The 1990s makes me feel that it is a working class decade, probably because of the Recession of the early 1990s, the Queen's horrible year in 1992, and the changes in society at that point.

    It seems that nearly everything these days is divided - I wish it wasn't though.


    Leave a comment:


  • Arran
    started a topic Working class vs middle class

    Working class vs middle class

    In 1970 there was a clearly defined working class and a clearly defined middle class in Britain.

    How has this class system changed over the past 50 years? Does it even still exist, or do we just have varying shades of grey in terms of wealth, power, influence, culture and lifestyle etc?

    Is the class system primarily a phenomenon of white indigenous British people that doesn't apply well to post war immigrants and their British born descendants?

    Is Britain now more divided by age rather than social class?

    Is home ownership now the most prominent demarcation line in society, immaterial of one's culture, education, career etc?
Working...
X