Re: Seat Belts
Even if the vehicle excise duty did still pay solely for road upkeep, I'm sure that the same car drivers who try to use the "I pay road tax" argument against cyclists wouldn't be too happy if run off the road by a 40-tonner whose driver then tried to argue "I pay more road tax than you so I have priority over you."
I'd say it was also an outrage upon common sense (not to mention fairplay) that a tax introduced under the auspices of it being to pay for one particular thing is hijacked to pay for all manner of other things. But of course, when it comes to taxation common sense and fairplay have never really figured into the equation at all, since the government is simply out to get as much tax as it thinks it can get away with by any means possible.
I regard taxation as nothing more than a legalized extortion racket run by the government: "Pay what we tell you or else!"
Even if the vehicle excise duty did still pay solely for road upkeep, I'm sure that the same car drivers who try to use the "I pay road tax" argument against cyclists wouldn't be too happy if run off the road by a 40-tonner whose driver then tried to argue "I pay more road tax than you so I have priority over you."
"Entertainments may be taxed; public houses may be taxed… and the yield devoted to the general revenue. But motorists are to be privileged for all time to have the tax on motors devoted to roads? This is an outrage upon… common sense."
I regard taxation as nothing more than a legalized extortion racket run by the government: "Pay what we tell you or else!"
Comment