School assembly: while the Head was at the front, some familiar adults were at the end of our lines as we sat down, cross-legged on the cold and hard parquet floor for half an hour, while listening to the Head, and perhaps even sing a hymn as well with a female Liberace murdering Morning Has Broken on the upright piano - and the majority of familiar adults were female - Miss or Mrs X - a loco parentis "mother" from 8.45 am to 3.15 pm five days a week, 38 weeks a year. It did make me thing of how male domination is seen to women and girls, and realised that the boot (and not the high feels) could indeed be on the other foot. Why so much Girl Power in education, I wonder? More Staceys and Natalies than Johns and Davids?
Throughout my Infant and Junior School career, I had four Misses and only one Sir as my "boss", and it made me think that Years 1 to 6 of school in UK at least that school is "female" and as a male, I was the "other". It is an interesting transposition to French philosopher Simone de Beauvoir in her 1949 book The Second Sex who had argued that in humanity in general the man is considered the default, while woman is considered the "other"; thus, humanity is male, and man defines woman not herself, but as relative to him. A school environment seemed to be transposed to this, probably because youngsters are probably used to more female attention than male. Primary school does seem feminine by virtue to the "gentle sex" who make up the core staff.
The was more than the case in Infant school, but at least at Junior school, I had a firm-bit-fair male Headteacher and Deputy Head. I did read on the BBC News website from 2006 - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/5074794.stm - that Primary schools (mostly inner-city ones) were often too feminine for boys, despite some establishments having completely male leadership. I for one, having a female teacher, felt as if she was biased towards the girls, especially in her manner of dress, speaking and direction, and one would have thought that had I been a girl, I would have had been treated more favourabily, but that would probably be because girls seemed to behave more sensibly than the boys did. One I would regard as a "schoolgirl in an adult's body" i.e. someone who would more likely to encourage those in her charge to be influenced by her and to leave school having similar attitudes. And it extends to the family: I grew up with two sisters rather than two brothers and so the minority gender extended to my family as well.
Infant school during the 1983-1984 academic year had every teaching staff member being female, and only one male member had joined in the second (1984-1985) year - I am not counting janitors and non-teaching staff here, and Junior school felt more balanced because of the gender of the Head and his Deputy, who remained the same throughout the four years I was there. I am almost certain that Joyce Grenfell's act didn't help much, for she seemed to contribute to the stereotype that nursery teachers were middle-aged to elderly, close to retirement, although my own scope seems to be the fact that they seemed to be a bit younger than that. Special Educational Needs teachers were almost likely to be female as well and so we have that situation there as well. It is like other "caring" professions: was it because females were more caring, hence nurses are most likely to be female?
And then I went to Comprehensive school many years later - during Year 9, the incumbent Headteacher retired and was replaced by a woman, and also one of the longstanding Deputy Heads was female as well, but that school felt more gender-balanced in hindsight. Perhaps Grange Hill's Bridget McClusky was one reason why female Headteachers in Comprehensive schools increased in the 1980s, or could it have anything to do with a female Prime Minister at the time? On her first day at my school, she mentioned in assembly and remarked that it is unusual for a woman to be in charge of a Secondary school, unlike its Primary counterparts - I assume that she didn't watch Grange Hill back then.
I suppose that when we grow up and develop from baby to toddler and then to child, we are a lot more used to feminine intuition: breastfeeding as a way of getting our milk so that we grow up to be strong and healthy - we seem to rely on women than men. When the child's father separates from the child's mother, it is Dad that makes himself scarce and Mum is left behind, having to bring the kids up on her own, literally left holding the baby, and we have the single mother stereotype, and her new partner is not likely to be the child's father by birth. Male role models are needed, not just in the family but also in school where one's peer group were like colleagues, i.e. a second family.
When boys did go to school back in the day, did they really feel that the system was a bit too feminine to meet their needs? - Did going to school each weekday feel like entering a sub-female environment? If the early years of school did have a gender, than "she" would almost definitely be female.
Throughout my Infant and Junior School career, I had four Misses and only one Sir as my "boss", and it made me think that Years 1 to 6 of school in UK at least that school is "female" and as a male, I was the "other". It is an interesting transposition to French philosopher Simone de Beauvoir in her 1949 book The Second Sex who had argued that in humanity in general the man is considered the default, while woman is considered the "other"; thus, humanity is male, and man defines woman not herself, but as relative to him. A school environment seemed to be transposed to this, probably because youngsters are probably used to more female attention than male. Primary school does seem feminine by virtue to the "gentle sex" who make up the core staff.
The was more than the case in Infant school, but at least at Junior school, I had a firm-bit-fair male Headteacher and Deputy Head. I did read on the BBC News website from 2006 - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/5074794.stm - that Primary schools (mostly inner-city ones) were often too feminine for boys, despite some establishments having completely male leadership. I for one, having a female teacher, felt as if she was biased towards the girls, especially in her manner of dress, speaking and direction, and one would have thought that had I been a girl, I would have had been treated more favourabily, but that would probably be because girls seemed to behave more sensibly than the boys did. One I would regard as a "schoolgirl in an adult's body" i.e. someone who would more likely to encourage those in her charge to be influenced by her and to leave school having similar attitudes. And it extends to the family: I grew up with two sisters rather than two brothers and so the minority gender extended to my family as well.
Infant school during the 1983-1984 academic year had every teaching staff member being female, and only one male member had joined in the second (1984-1985) year - I am not counting janitors and non-teaching staff here, and Junior school felt more balanced because of the gender of the Head and his Deputy, who remained the same throughout the four years I was there. I am almost certain that Joyce Grenfell's act didn't help much, for she seemed to contribute to the stereotype that nursery teachers were middle-aged to elderly, close to retirement, although my own scope seems to be the fact that they seemed to be a bit younger than that. Special Educational Needs teachers were almost likely to be female as well and so we have that situation there as well. It is like other "caring" professions: was it because females were more caring, hence nurses are most likely to be female?
And then I went to Comprehensive school many years later - during Year 9, the incumbent Headteacher retired and was replaced by a woman, and also one of the longstanding Deputy Heads was female as well, but that school felt more gender-balanced in hindsight. Perhaps Grange Hill's Bridget McClusky was one reason why female Headteachers in Comprehensive schools increased in the 1980s, or could it have anything to do with a female Prime Minister at the time? On her first day at my school, she mentioned in assembly and remarked that it is unusual for a woman to be in charge of a Secondary school, unlike its Primary counterparts - I assume that she didn't watch Grange Hill back then.
I suppose that when we grow up and develop from baby to toddler and then to child, we are a lot more used to feminine intuition: breastfeeding as a way of getting our milk so that we grow up to be strong and healthy - we seem to rely on women than men. When the child's father separates from the child's mother, it is Dad that makes himself scarce and Mum is left behind, having to bring the kids up on her own, literally left holding the baby, and we have the single mother stereotype, and her new partner is not likely to be the child's father by birth. Male role models are needed, not just in the family but also in school where one's peer group were like colleagues, i.e. a second family.
When boys did go to school back in the day, did they really feel that the system was a bit too feminine to meet their needs? - Did going to school each weekday feel like entering a sub-female environment? If the early years of school did have a gender, than "she" would almost definitely be female.
Comment