Ad_Forums-Top

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Band Aid 30 years on

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Richard1978
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    Originally posted by darren View Post
    i actually quite liked it we are the world so lets keep on giving.t

    todays band aid tho the singers in it dont compare to the ones in we are the world or in the original band aid.
    too many now cant sing.


    come on im sure they could have found better artists why not get say tina turner and madonna some country music superstars.
    Kenny Rogers is on We Are The World, if that's what you were referring to. Madonna wanted to be but was double booked the day it was recorded.

    She made up for it being being on the first to agree to perform at Live Aid.

    Leave a comment:


  • darren
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    i actually quite liked it we are the world so lets keep on giving.t

    todays band aid tho the singers in it dont compare to the ones in we are the world or in the original band aid.
    too many now cant sing.


    come on im sure they could have found better artists why not get say tina turner and madonna some country music superstars.





    Originally posted by scotchmist View Post
    What about the American effort "We are the World", such a pathetic song with inane lyrics, although it was quite an impressive line-up. I heard that thousands of dollars were spent on the celebrity buffet during the recording of the song, trust the yanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • scotchmist
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    What about the American effort "We are the World", such a pathetic song with inane lyrics, although it was quite an impressive line-up. I heard that thousands of dollars were spent on the celebrity buffet during the recording of the song, trust the yanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    Originally posted by Cooldeepblue View Post
    I would have to agree there
    soulmatez!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cooldeepblue
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    Originally posted by Asher D View Post
    bland aid.
    I would have to agree there

    Leave a comment:


  • Asher D
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    bland aid.

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard1978
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    Originally posted by chipito View Post
    But what did they do with all those millions back then?
    Surely over the years they've had more "free" money than they can shake a stick at and yet every year they come back with their hands out for more.

    I'm full of the Christmas spirit, eh folks !!
    I remember the 1985 reissue of Feed The World had a video showing all the things the money had been spent on.

    Leave a comment:


  • chipito
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    But what did they do with all those millions back then?
    Surely over the years they've had more "free" money than they can shake a stick at and yet every year they come back with their hands out for more.

    I'm full of the Christmas spirit, eh folks !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Richard1978
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    I've not heard the new one yet.

    The original was really something special, & stands the test of time.

    I wasn't too keen on the 1989 version, it hardly every gets played these days.

    The 2004 version was OK apart from the rap, which spoilt it slightly, but the early parts were fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • darren
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    Oh yes s a and w.

    But where these others to raise money for a certain disaster as this yrs one is and the originals was.
    But the original was a great event great song great artists.


    Originally posted by scotchmist View Post
    the 1989 one was produced by stock, aitken & waterman who dominated the pop scene back then, just listened to it again today on youtube for the first time in 20 years and it still sounds better than the two subsequent remakes. Of course i don't think you can ever beat the original and it had such a great video. The 2004 one was unlistenable. The current one just sounds too polished and synthetic....and as for the dull video....

    Leave a comment:


  • scotchmist
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    The 1989 one was produced by Stock, Aitken & Waterman who dominated the pop scene back then, just listened to it again today on YouTube for the first time in 20 years and it still sounds better than the two subsequent remakes. Of course I don't think you can ever beat the original and it had such a great video. The 2004 one was unlistenable. The current one just sounds too polished and synthetic....and as for the dull video....

    Leave a comment:


  • darren
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    1989 version 2004 version never remembered them what where they for as in what disaster to raise cash for.


    Originally posted by Jabbso View Post
    Wish they'd have re-released the original instead of recording a new version. The 2004 version was equally as awful although I quite liked the 1989 one.

    Guess I'll listen to the original and donate a tenner to the ebola campaign.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jabbso
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    Wish they'd have re-released the original instead of recording a new version. The 2004 version was equally as awful although I quite liked the 1989 one.

    Guess I'll listen to the original and donate a tenner to the ebola campaign.

    Leave a comment:


  • xmark1234
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    I must admit better than the one with rapping in it

    Leave a comment:


  • amethyst
    replied
    Re: Band Aid 30 years on

    Sorry but I didnt like the original and we have to put up with hearing it each xmas,as for this one I am not particulary interested

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X