Ad_Forums-Top

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was music really better in the 70’s/80’s/90’s — or are we remembering it differently?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Was music really better in the 70’s/80’s/90’s — or are we remembering it differently?

    It’s a common complaint that modern music is terrible compared to the music of the 70s, 80s and 90s. I hear it all the time, and if I’m honest, I’ve probably said it myself on occasion.

    But I’ve started to wonder if part of the reason older music seems better is because history has already done the filtering for us.

    When we think of the 70s, we remember the best songs by artists such as Pink Floyd, Queen, David Bowie, ABBA, Fleetwood Mac and many others. When we think of the 80s, we remember the biggest hits and most memorable records. The same applies to the 90s.

    What we tend to forget is that there was also a lot of forgettable, disposable and downright awful music released in those decades too. Most of it has vanished from radio playlists, streaming services, television programmes and public memory.

    Today we’re hearing everything at once: the classics of tomorrow, the average songs and the outright rubbish. Perhaps in twenty or thirty years’ time people will look back on the 2020s and hear only the very best tracks that have stood the test of time, giving the impression that this era was much stronger than it felt at the time.

    That said, I still can’t shake the feeling that songwriting was generally stronger in previous decades. Whether it was because artists had more time to develop, because record companies invested differently, because bands tended to play together for years before becoming successful, or because musical trends weren’t changing at internet speed, many songs seemed to have stronger melodies, more memorable hooks and greater individuality.

    Maybe nostalgia is playing tricks on me. Or maybe there really was something special about those earlier decades.

    What do you think? Was music genuinely better in the 70s, 80s and 90s, or are we simply comparing the greatest hits of the past with the entire output of the present?

  • #2
    better in the past. 99% of today's music is unlistenable

    Comment


    • #3
      All depends on personal taste.
      I would say my favourite decade of music would probably be 1968 to 1978. I still listen to Cream, King Crimson, ELP, Yes, Gabriel-era Genesis, Ash Ra Tempel, Jethro Tull, Uriah Heep, Led Zeppelin, Ange, Kevin Ayers, Pink Floyd and such like today.
      Those years though also gave us the likes of the Glitter Band, Bay City Rollers, Osmonds, Bee Gees etc.
      At least the abomination that is rap/hip-hop didn't get much if any air-time back then!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by sixtyten View Post
        better in the past. 99% of today's music is unlistenable
        I think I may have to agree. Although, there are some tunes that do stand out from the rest — but I don’t think they’ll have the staying-power of songs from the past. Besides, the 99% of today’s “terrible” songs will probably mean nothing compared to the 20% or 30% of terrible songs from the past.
        Last edited by TubThumper; 12 hours ago.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Cartimand View Post
          All depends on personal taste.
          I would say my favourite decade of music would probably be 1968 to 1978. I still listen to Cream, King Crimson, ELP, Yes, Gabriel-era Genesis, Ash Ra Tempel, Jethro Tull, Uriah Heep, Led Zeppelin, Ange, Kevin Ayers, Pink Floyd and such like today.
          Those years though also gave us the likes of the Glitter Band, Bay City Rollers, Osmonds, Bee Gees etc.
          At least the abomination that is rap/hip-hop didn't get much if any air-time back then!

          That’s partly what I was getting at. Every decade contains both music we remember fondly and music we’d rather forget.

          Looking back, we tend to keep the artists we loved and quietly discard the rest. Someone who loves prog rock remembers Yes, Genesis and King Crimson. Someone else remembers ABBA, the Bee Gees and Elton John. A punk fan remembers the Sex Pistols and The Clash. They’re all looking at the same decade through different lenses.

          I also think it’s worth remembering that rap and hip-hop have now been around for over 40 years. Plenty of people who grew up in the 1980s and 1990s probably view classic hip-hop in exactly the same way that rock fans view Led Zeppelin or Pink Floyd. Whether we personally like a genre or not, if it has lasted that long then it has clearly connected with a huge audience.

          I personally have no Hip-Hop/Rap in my music catalogue; but I do have the “rock/hip-hop” fusion such as Red Hot Chilli Peppers, Rage Against The Machine, Limp Bizkit etc…

          It’s kind of ironic, as many rock fans will still talk about hip-hop as if it’s a passing fad, yet it has now lasted longer than glam rock, Britpop, grunge, nu-metal, emo and most other rock movements. Whether one likes it or not, it’s become one of the major musical traditions of the last half-century.

          Comment


          • #6
            When I first became passionate about music in the 90s every song on an album was good. Now you get one good song per album. Mind, Dinosaur Jnr? One good song in their entire career. But nobody would class them with REM.

            Comment

            Working...
            X